The US Supreme Court's May 21, 1934 opinion in RCA v. Radio Engineering Laboratories, upholding Lee de Forest's claim to the regenerative circuit against Edwin Armstrong's on the strength of a 1912 laboratory notebook entry, over a heavy presumption of patent validity.
Facts
PublisherCornell Law School, Legal Information Institute
Source TypePrimary legal document, US Supreme Court opinion
AuthorSupreme Court of the United States
Publication Year1934
URLhttps://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/293/1
Sources
RCA v. Radio Engineering Laboratories, 293 U.S. 1 (1934)
Supreme Court of the United States, Cornell Law School, Legal Information Institute, 1934View the Source RCA v. Radio Engineering Laboratories, 293 U.S. 1 (1934)
Supreme Court of the United States, Cornell Law School, Legal Information Institute, 1934law.cornell.edu, case text headerView the Source RCA v. Radio Engineering Laboratories, 293 U.S. 1 (1934)
Supreme Court of the United States, Cornell Law School, Legal Information Institute, 1934293 U.S. 1, decided May 21, 1934View the Source Claims Backed By This Source (6 claims)
This source backs 6 claims across the atlas. As facts: 6 well-attested.
Disposition By Topic
- Sources, 6 claims: 6 well-attested.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.