Film and Media Atlas

How Stories Are Broadcast
Milestones

Fairness Doctrine Repeal

Broadcasting

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

The fairness doctrine had required United States broadcast license holders to devote airtime to controversial matters of public importance and to present contrasting viewpoints on them fairly. On August 4, 1987, the Federal Communications Commission abolished the doctrine by a unanimous 4 to 0 vote under chairman Dennis R. Patrick. Its repeal remains genuinely disputed among scholars and commentators: some argue the doctrine had allowed a more robust public debate and produced positive political change, while others viewed it as an attack on First Amendment and property rights; the repeal has also been credited with enabling the rise of conservative talk radio, Rush Limbaugh's national syndication followed within a year, and it has been cited as a contributing factor in rising political polarization in the United States.

Facts
Milestone Year
1987 1
When
The Federal Communications Commission voted 4 to 0 on August 4, 1987 to repeal the Fairness Doctrine, which had required broadcasters to present contrasting views on controversial issues of public importance. 1
Location
Washington, D.C., United States 1
Cross-Tradition Connections

Credited To

In Medium

Radio, Media Forms
Sources
1. Wikipedia
Wikimedia FoundationFairness doctrine, Revocation and Conservative talk radio sectionsView the Source
1. Wikipedia
Wikimedia FoundationFairness doctrine, Revocation section, repeal dateView the Source
1. Wikipedia
Wikimedia FoundationFairness Doctrine, RepealView the Source
1. Wikipedia
Wikimedia FoundationCredited To: Federal Communications Commission, Fairness doctrine, Revocation section, FCC voteView the Source
Dissenting Readings (1 dissenting reading)
Description

Senator Dick Durbin has argued it is time to reinstitute the fairness doctrine, a position shared by several other members of Congress who have periodically sought to restore it by law, disputing the settled framing that the 1987 repeal was an unambiguous improvement for public debate.

A dissenting reading, from Dick DurbinWikipedia, Wikimedia Foundation
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.